Suchergebnisse

• eJournal-Artikel aus "PinG Privacy in Germany" Ausgabe 1/2016

  Safe Harbor invalidated – What next?

  Paul Voigt, Jeremiah Posedel

  …Harbor was invalidated and the European Data Protection Authorities’ investigation powers were strengthened significantly. Currently, it is not yet certain… …adequacy invalid in general, it may take a closer look at data transfers justified on the basis of a respective adequacy decision and come to the conclusion… …European Commission in 2013, 17 which criticized that the US authorities accessed transferred data and processed it in a way incompatible with the purposes… …for which it was initially transferred and beyond what is strictly necessary and proportionate to the protection of national security. 18 c) Laying down… …consequences for data transfers based on these alternative transfer mechanisms, too. –– Furthermore, it is surprising that the Court actively opts for… …recognizes that the ­Schrems decision may have consequences also for other transfer mechanisms, the UK ICO states that it will not “rush” into using its… …­efforts, the US is confident that it can address the concerns raised by the Court in Schrems and that Safe Harbor 2.0 will come to fruition. According to U… …support for the bill and many companies that relied on Safe Harbor have already urged Congress to pass it, including Google, Facebook, Microsoft, the U. S… …Even though the US came the EU’s way during the last two years, it remains questionable whether the recent changes in US surveillance law indeed satisfy…

  Alle Treffer im Inhalt anzeigen